In Re Shack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• advertisement for contact lenses was deceptive where it failed to indicate that additional professional services not included in the advertised price were required for the vast majority of customers
• board’s letter which revealed to defendants the basis for the charges against them and the statutes allegedly violated, together with a plenary hearing, satisfied due process requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).