In Re: Seko Investment, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Debtor. Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Seko Investment, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the possibility that a counterclaim may not be subject to a “bona fide dispute” under § 303(b) but may be subject to a “bona fide dispute” under § 303(h) because § 303(b
• alleged debtor's counterclaim to offset amount due under separate title insurance policy against amount separately due under promissory notes
• “If recoupment applies, the creditor’s claim arises from the same transaction as the debtor’s claim, and it is essentially a defense to the debtor’s claim against the creditor rather than a mutual obligation.” (simplified)
• “Claims are contingent as to liability when the debtor’s duty to pay arises only upon the occurrence of a future event that was contemplated by the parties at the time of the contract’s execution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).