In Re Seizure Warrants Issued March 27, 2008, & April 23, 2008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find constructive seizure of businesses where businesses had continued to operate and generate a profit for six months or more
• rejecting claimant’s argument that the exception applied to “the assets which have been seized from a legitimate business” and determining that the phrase “which has been seized” modifies “legitimate business,” not “assets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).