In re Seif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 54(b) certification was invalid because it lacked articulated reasoning, but concluding the wrongful certification had still started the time for appeal
• holding that a Rule 54(b) certification was invalid because it lacked articulated reasoning, but concluding the wrongful certification had still started the time for appeal
• holding that a district court’s failure to include articulated reasons is not a jurisdictional defect and therefore the erroneously certified order still starts the time for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).