In re Seawright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Triestman in reversing a district court’s grant of summary judgment against a pro se plaintiff
• remanding because prison did not demonstrate why it could not provide Jewish prisoner “more of the acceptable food it already prepares” or order him prepackaged kosher food
• “[U]nexplained disparate treatment of ‘analogous nonreligious conduct’ leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.”
• \[U]nexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [the plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.\
• \[U]nexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to suspect that a narrower policy that burdens [the plaintiffs] to a lesser degree is in fact possible.\
• \Such unexplained disparate treatment of 'analogous nonreligious conduct' leads us to question whether the [government's] interest . . . is as compelling as it suggests . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).