Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 8/7/2020

In re: Sealed Case

Citations

  • 971 F.3d 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a]s many courts have recognized, there is a heighted public interest when an individual . . . files a suit against the government”
  • supporting pseudonymity where either plaintiff or “innocent non-parties” would face “risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm”
  • observing that the public interest is “intensified” in such circumstances
  • listing as examples “sexual activities,” “medical concerns,” or “identity of abused minors”
  • noting courts “generally require parties to a lawsuit to openly identify themselves to protect the public’s legitimate interest in knowing all of the facts involved, including the identities of the parties.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted
  • “Plaintiff anticipates that a public second lawsuit will undoubtedly harm future employment opportunities both within and outside the Department”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.