Skip to main content
· 10/3/1996

In Re Sdds, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1030
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20290
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26020
  • 1996 WL 560205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Young applicable in an action to enjoin state officials from enforcing a law in violation of the Commerce Clause
  • describing the Anti-Injunction Act as “[e]mbodying the precepts of federalism and comity between federal and state courts[]”
  • authorizing application of the Dataphase factors to questions regarding federal injunctive relief under the relitigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act
  • including comity as a public interest to be considered in a preliminary injunction analysis
  • \[T]he relitigation exception is 'narrow and [is] not to be enlarged by loose statutory construction.'\ (quoting Chick Kam Choo, 486 U.S. at 146)
  • “The electorate vetoed the MSWD facility, which ‘shut down’ SDDS’s MSWD site.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magill, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.