In Re Scotti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the inclusion of the phrase \or a dependent of the debtor\ in subsection 15-41-30(A)(1)(a) does not create a separate exemption for the \dependent\ in addition to that of the debtor
• “[I]n order to exempt property, not only must the 12 property be part of the bankruptcy estate under § 541, the debtor 13 claiming the exemption must own the property, or have an interest 14 in the property.” (Quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Schmidtke
  D. Colorado· 2014-03-11· cited 2×
• In re Childers
  D. South Carolina· 2015-02-19· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Botkin v. DuPont Community Credit Union
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-06-13· cited 13×
• Matter of Cunningham
  D. Massachusetts· 1980-08-27· cited 13×
• In Re Hartman
  C.D. Illinois· 1997-08-20· cited 11×
• In Re Cohen
  D. New Jersey· 2001-07-10· cited 10×
• Matter of Trotta
  D. Connecticut· 1981-07-20· cited 7×
• Matter of Freund
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1983-08-30· cited 6×
• In Re Patel
  D. South Carolina· 2010-06-11· cited 1×
• In re Wilkinson
  E.D. Virginia· 1989-05-30· cited 1×