Skip to main content
· 3/2/2006

In Re Schweizer

Citations

  • 354 B.R. 272
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2124
  • 2006 WL 2536306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the TILA rescission remedy did not apply where borrowers used funds to acquire a primary residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.