Skip to main content
· 5/18/1932

In Re Schulte-United

Citations

  • 59 F.2d 553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion to vacate an order, and an appeal from the denial of that motion, is not the equivalent of an appeal from the order itself, therefore, the reviewing court can only review the propriety of denying the motion to vacate
  • minor irregularities in notice are not cause for reversal where creditors were represented at hearing and notice to each creditor would have served little purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Valkenburgh and Sanborn, Circuit Judges, and Davis, District Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.