Skip to main content

In Re Schmidt

Citations

  • 429 A.2d 631
  • 494 Pa. 86
  • 1981 Pa. LEXIS 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing statutory responsibilities of the state and county to provide “mental retardation services”
  • “In this [Schmidt’s] case the need for institutionalization can neither be prevented or minimized. There is no less restrictive alternative available for the county to provide. The concept of normalization is not a consideration in the placement of Joseph [Schmidt]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Kauffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.