Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/24/1998
In Re Scheiber
Citations
- 724 A.2d 475
- 168 Vt. 534
- 1998 Vt. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a shooting range was not a land development requiring a zoning permit
- noting that “accessory uses have traditionally involved such various activities as home occupations, tennis courts, and airplane 8 hangers”
- describing Scheiber’s concern “was based primarily on the fact that the weapons were fired in the general direction of his house.”
- construing certain recreational activities as “neither regulated nor contemplated” by zoning ordinance
- describing three occasions where landowners “used the range in connection with a rifle safety course for the benefit of the local chapter of the American Pistol and Rifle Association,” which had also “held four annual picnics at the range”
- “[D]e minimis uses of private property . . . are neither regulated nor contemplated by the zoning regulations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Laberge Moto-Cross TrackSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-01-06· cited 68×
- In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-10-08· cited 33×
- In Re WilletteD. Vermont· 2008-10-17· cited 9×
- In Re Brewster River Mountain Bike Club, Inc. Conditional Use Application (David Demarest & Jeff Moulton, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont· 2025-01-17· cited 3×
- Laberge NOVVermont Superior Court· 2015-10-15
- Brady Sullivan SV, LLC NOVVermont Superior Court· 2014-09-26
- Fowler NOVVermont Superior Court· 2013-02-04
- In re: Appeal of Jeffrey Jacobs (Decision and Order on Appellant's Motion for Summary Judgment)Vermont Superior Court· 2001-06-08
- Brewster River Mountain Bike Club CU Application - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court· 2023-12-21
- Benson Road Site Plan & Condition Use - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court· 2021-12-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-13· cited 145×
- Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-01-24· cited 115×
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-04-14· cited 40×
- Chatham v. DonaldsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1961-10-13· cited 23×
- Route 4 Associates v. Town of Sherburne Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-15· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.