In re Scarborough Properties Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the bus driver’s rudeness and profanity did “not meet the extreme and outrageous conduct standard for the imposition of liability for infliction of emotional distress, whether intentionally ... or negligently”
• arguing that “[o]ccasional problems, without more, do not constitute a violation of the ADA.”
• “The ADA and its implementing regulations do not contemplate perfect service for wheelchair-using bus commuters.”
• bus driver’s rudeness and profanity toward wheelchair-bound passenger
• bus driver's rudeness and profanity toward wheel-chair-bound passenger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).