In Re: Sato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that pre-Gouveia “Supreme Court cases seem to imply that a more functional test . . . is appropriate”
• taped telephone conversations with targets represented by counsel did not violate Sixth Amendment right to counsel before indictment
• co-defendant who cooperated with IRS agent was not alter ego of prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).