Skip to main content
· 7/30/1993

In Re Sarah T.

Citations

  • 629 A.2d 53
  • 1993 Me. LEXIS 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a court’s application of a rebuttable presumption of parental unfitness in a termination case did not violate a parent’s right to due process or equal protection
  • finding a compelling state interest in achieving timely permanence for abused children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Collins, Dana

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.