In Re Santa Clara Circuits West, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• § 362 and § 366 must be construed so as to avoid contradiction, citing general rule of construction of statutes
• a utility’s demand for a cash deposit under § 366 does not violate the automatic stay
• maximum cash deposit necessary to provide adequate assurance of payment is amount sufficient to cover average billing period plus amount sufficient to cover services between the end of the billing period and the due date of payment for that period
• discussing alternatives and types of “other security” available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).