Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 4/12/1904

In re Sanborn

Citations

  • 131 F. 397
  • 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212

Syllabus

<p>1. Bankruptcy — Discharge—Opposition—Discontinuance—Collusion.</p> <p>Where, on an application for a bankrupt’s discharge, it appeared that certain creditors had opposed the discharge, and had applied for time to file specifications, but, though the time had expired, the specifications had not been filed, and the referee, in a supplemental report, had refused a certificate of conformity required by bankruptcy rule 10, the facts tended to create a iiresumption or a suspicion that some act had been done by or on behalf of the bankrupt to secure the discontinuance of the opposition, justifying the refusal of the bankrupt’s discharge pending a further report by the referee.</p>

Judges: Hazed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.