Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a third-party was not named in an underlying S.E.C. action, due process requirements were met because opportunities for a hearing were available before any material deprivation of a property interest occurred
• concluding that district court may include non-party’s property in SEC receivership order “as long as the non-party . . . receives actual notice and an opportunity for a hearing.”
• “The Constitution requires that property owners receive procedural due process in the form of notice and opportunity for a hearing.”
• “Generally, federal courts enjoy wide 6 discretion in fashioning relief and protective measures in SEC actions.”
• receiver appointed pursuant to S.E.C. motion prior to chapter 11 filing
• “[A] district court has 11 the power to include the property of a non-party . . . in [a] receivership order as long as the 12 non-party meets the minimum contacts standard set out in International Shoe and receives 13 actual notice and an opportunity for a hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).