In Re Samuel Bottari, A/K/A Santo Bottari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• which have been emasculated by the subsequent amendments to F.R.Cr.P. 16(a)(1), as is revealed by Judge Frankel's masterful opinion in United States v. Projansky, 44 F.R.D. 550 (S.D.N.Y., 1968
• “it would be naive on the part of the court to think that appellant seeks these answers for his own protection as distinguished from attempted discovery by other persons interested in the grand jury proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).