Skip to main content
· 7/18/2011

In Re Salander O'Reilly Galleries

Citations

  • 453 B.R. 106
  • 65 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1703
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2688
  • 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 50
  • 2011 WL 2837494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Stern v. Marshall emphasizes that it is limited to the particular circumstances surrounding the estate’s counterclaim in that case
  • “Stern is replete with language emphasizing that the ruling should be limited to the unique circumstances of that case.”
  • “Nowhere in ... Stem does the Supreme Court rule that the bankruptcy court may not rule with respect to state law ... when deciding a matter directly and conclusively related to the bankruptcy.”
  • “Bankruptcy courts may apply state law as a part of resolution of core proceedings.”
  • application of state law to allow claims properly rests in the bankruptcy court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cecelia G. Morris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.