in Re Saks & Company LLC D/B/A Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th and Dennis Joseph Belmonte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “purported First Amendment right to record [police officers] was not clearly established in August 2014”
• holding that “general First Amendment principles protecting the creation of speech and the gathering of news” do not clearly establish a First Amendment right to film the police
• noting cited cases for clearly established analysis “did not have at issue any allegations of an unlawful conspiracy.”
• noting in a Section 1983 case that “parallel action does not necessarily indicate an agreement to act in concert”
• “thank[ing] amici for their helpful briefing on the issue of whether the right exists”
• “Therefore, proof that defendants engaged in ‘[p]arallel action . . . does not necessarily indicate an agreement to act in concert.’” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).