In Re Sabetta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that aggrieved officer should have applied in Superior Court for an order directing the municipality to show cause why his right to an investigation conducted without public comment should not be afforded
• “[W]hen the language of a statute is unambiguous and expresses a clear and sensible meaning, no room for statutory construction or extension exists, and we are required to give the words of the statute their plain and obvious meaning.”
• “[W]hen the language of a statute is unambiguous and expresses a clear and sensible meaning, no room for statutory construction or extension exists, and we are required to give the words of the statute their plain and obvious meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).