In re S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process requires parental unfitness be established by clear and convincing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Janira T.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-12· cited 24×
• People v. Mitchell C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-04-07· cited 17×
• People v. Luz M.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-19
• In re Noelia M.
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2014-08-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• People v. Urbasek
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-11-30· cited 119×
• In Re Paul
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 92×
• People v. Enis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 58×
• People v. Dorsey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-11-29· cited 38×
• People v. Connie C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-27· cited 37×
• In Re CC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-27· cited 26×
• People v. Prough
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-06-02· cited 23×