In re S. R. M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding district court did not abuse discretion where evidence did not support declarant's assertion that declarant made statements in bad faith
• concluding that murder victim \clearly was unavailable as a witness\
• explaining that the appellee's third alternative argument was to uphold the trial court as right for the wrong reason
• concluding condition met when there was “no suggestion [tire] statements were not made in good faith or were made with an incentive to falsify or distort”
• holding identical offense doctrine \applies only when two separate criminal offenses are compared\
• noting Crawford governs admissibility of testimonial hearsay while statutory hearsay exceptions govern admissibility of nontestimonial hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).