In re R.W., H.S., and A.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that purpose of exceptian may be that “such professionals frequently provide services respecting loans or the transfer of a business which fall within the definition of negotiating”
• “we interpret the statute to require written agreements where there is to be compensation ‘for service as a broker or finder’”
• agreement for solicitation of new accounts and sales territories for the seller’s food products in return for a commission was covered by section 7 and therefore required a writing
• title “not conclusive as to [act’s] ambiguities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).