In Re Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts have 3 imposed liability for CWA violations on . . . those responsible for or in control of performance of 4 work in violation of the statute.” (citation omitted)
• “[W]here a party has no decision making authority, does not 5 participate in the planning of a project, and whose will has no impact on whether and to what 6 extent dredge materials are discharged into waters of the United States, that party cannot suffer 7 liability under CWA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Oglesby
  D. Colorado· 1998-06-12· cited 11×
• In Re Younger
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1998-01-12· cited 10×
• In Re Scott
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-05-24· cited 8×
• In Re Nice
  N.D. West Virginia· 2006-10-30· cited 8×
• In Re Knight
  C.D. Illinois· 2000-10-12· cited 5×
• In re Sweeney
  E.D. North Carolina· 2016-08-18· cited 1×
• In re Brown
  E.D. North Carolina· 2016-10-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-16· cited 471×
• In the Matter of Zandal Hoskins and Debra A. Hoskins, Debtors-Appellees. Appeal of Nbd Bank, N.A
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-12-12· cited 29×