Skip to main content
· 2/11/1909

In re Rumpf

Citations

  • 115 N.Y.S. 1143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Actavis appears to impose a three-part inquiry” where plaintiffs must show a reverse payment, that is large and unjustified, and that violates the rule of reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.