Skip to main content
· 3/12/1969

In Re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Fla.

Citations

  • 220 So. 2d 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to approve an ethics rule that would have prohibited an employee-attorney from representing anyone other than the employer \unless it shall clearly appear that the sole financial interest and risk involved is that of the lay agency\
  • rejecting proposed Rule of Conduct prohibiting the practice
  • rejecting proposed Rule of Conduct prohibiting the practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.