E.D. Pennsylvania· 11/8/2013
In re Ruiz
Citations
- 501 B.R. 76
- 2013 WL 5998858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying New York law and cursorily concluding after reviewing some, but not all, of the contract provisions that the HUD regulations forbade charging the inspection fee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raslavich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsThird Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 228×
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. VukmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-09-25· cited 64×
- In Re RorieE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-04-10· cited 31×
- Galloway v. Long Beach Mortgage Co. (In Re Galloway)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-04-14· cited 25×
- Smith v. Kissell Co. (In Re Smith)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-11-01· cited 24×
- Main Line Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. JoyceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-04-08· cited 19×
- In Re BertschN.D. Ohio· 1982-01-27· cited 10×
- Fleetwood Acres, Inc. v. National Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court· 1945-10-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.