Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/12/2009

In Re Ruffin

Citations

677 S.E.2d 25
382 S.C. 598
2009 S.C. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“We hold disbarment without retroaction, costs, and restitution are warranted sanctions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

In Re Crews
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 9×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

In the Matter of Hines
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-09-02· cited 9×
In Re Ruffin
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 2×
In Re Wilmeth
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 2×
Matter of Morehouse
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-13· cited 1×
In Re Ruffin
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-07-28· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.