Skip to main content
· 3/11/2011

In Re Rubiola

Citations

  • 334 S.W.3d 220
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 654
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 194
  • 2011 WL 836927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nonsignatories could compel arbitration where mortgage financing agreement contained broad arbitration clause and defined “parties” to include certain nonsignatories
  • holding that ″parties to an arbitration agreement may grant non-signatories the right to compel arbitration″
  • holding that, generally, ″parties must sign arbitration agreements before being bound by them″
  • explaining that obligation to arbitrate in agreement may bind non-signatory under principles of agency
  • agreement to arbitrate is valid if it meets general contract law requirements of the state
  • “Because the arbitration agreement expressly provides that certain non- signatories are considered parties, we conclude that such parties may compel arbitration under the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Medina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.