In re: R.S., A.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting child was “diagnosed with failure to thrive” and weighed less than he did at birth
• noting child was “diagnosed with failure to thrive” and weighed less than he did at birth
• “[Respondents] delayed meetings between the social worker and the [older] children, delayed and limited medical tests, and appear to have omitted information.”
• “[Respondents] delayed meetings between the social worker and the [older] children, delayed and limited medical tests, and appear to have omitted information.”
• “Uncontested findings of fact are ‘presumed to be supported by competent evidence and [are] binding on appeal.’” (quoting Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97, 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991))
• “Uncontested findings of fact are ‘presumed to be supported by competent evidence and [are] binding on appeal.’” (quoting Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97, 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: K.L. & J.A. II
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-06-16
• In re: D.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-10-18

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In re: J.A.M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-20· cited 7×