Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/9/2018

In re R.P.

Citations

2018 Ohio 517
105 N.E.3d 737

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that a grant of permanent custody to Appellee, a children services board, was in the best interests of Appellant's minor children. The trial court's findings under R.C. 2151.414(D) and (E) were supported by competent, credible evidence. Appellee also made reasonable efforts to reunify the family and prevent the continued removal of the children. Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re N.C. & A.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-15· cited 16×
In re J.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-29
In re A.J.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-18

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

In re C.F.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
In re Schaefer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
In re K.H.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
In re C.W.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 212×
In re D.A.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 172×
In re H.M.K.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 85×
In re S.J.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-03· cited 52×
In re E.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-17· cited 18×
In re E.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-20· cited 15×
In re S.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-15· cited 12×
In re A.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-26· cited 12×
In re N.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-26· cited 8×
In re C.O.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-16· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.