In Re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court had specific personal jurisdiction over an employee who allegedly signed filings that contained materially false and misleading information
• “Finally, as Defendant Watts submits no arguments which convince the Court that asserting jurisdiction over him would violate notions of fair play and substantial justice, this Court concludes that jurisdiction over this foreign defendant is reasonable.”
• “United States courts have frequently asserted personal jurisdiction over individual defendants who sign or, as control persons, approve the filing or disseminating of, particular forms required by the SEC which they knew or should have known would be relied on by U.S. investors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).