In Re Rowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing with Nepil and Winogora and holding that the “last payment” language of § 1322(c)(2) refers to the date of the last payment on the original note rather than the date the accelerated debt is due

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Feldman
  E.D. New York· 2004-04-06· cited 11×
• In Re Anderson
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2011-09-29· cited 9×
• In re Goione
  D. New Jersey· 2019-01-08· cited 9×
• In re Tekavec
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2012-08-15· cited 4×
• In re Mendez
  D. New Jersey· 2019-04-10· cited 4×
• In Re Amos
  C.D. Illinois· 2001-01-26· cited 2×
• In Re Duran
  D. Wyoming· 2001-12-04· cited 2×
• In re Holmes
  D. New Jersey· 2017-09-19· cited 2×