In Re Rothman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If competitive advertising among lawyers were permitted, the conscientious ethical practitioner would be inescapably at the mercy of the braggart.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1961-11-01· cited 69×
• Amer. Trial Lawyers Assoc. v. NJ Supreme Ct.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-02-14· cited 46×
• Autotote Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-03-23· cited 39×
• Kerpelman v. Bricker
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-12-16· cited 31×
• In Re Cornelius
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-04-22· cited 21×
• Petition of Felmeister & Isaacs
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-12-10· cited 20×
• Burlington Tp. v. Middle Dep't Inspection Agency, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-08-28· cited 15×
• State v. Zold
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-03-14· cited 11×
• Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Bjorklund
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 3×
• Nj State Bar Ass'n v. Northern Nj Mtg. Assoc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-04-17· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stack v. P. G. Garage, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-05-07· cited 34×
• In re Cohen
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-01-03· cited 26×
• Libarian v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1943-04-19· cited 17×
• In re Schwarz
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1916-12-01· cited 17×
• Farrell v. Farrell
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-01-06· cited 17×
• Wendl v. Fuerst
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-11-11· cited 13×
• In re Thibodeau
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1936-09-09· cited 12×
• In re Tuthill
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1939-03-17· cited 9×
• In re O'Neil
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1930-01-31· cited 7×
• In re L. R.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-06-25· cited 6×
• In re Schwarz
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1921-02-11· cited 5×
• Seitz v. Dry-Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad
  New York Court of Common Pleas· 1890-06-02· cited 5×
• Carter Coal Co. v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-10-14· cited 5×