In Re Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when it enacted N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2, Legislature “deliberately chose to alter the more expansive view of expungement that had existed under N.J.S.A. 2A:164-28 and that was exemplified by [the] decision in Fontana”
• noting that Legislature’s choice to modify “crime,” rather than “conviction,” with adjectives “prior” and “subsequent,” supports conclusion that expungement is unavailable for crimes committed on separate occasions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re J.S.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-08-10· cited 23×
• In the Matter of the Expungement of the Criminal Records of G.P.B.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-06-09· cited 7×
• In re the Expungement of the Criminal Records of R.Z.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-01-28· cited 5×
• In the Matter of the Expungement Petition
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-08-10
• In the Matter of the Expungement Application of K.M.G.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2023-11-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of Manalapan
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-06-06· cited 2,534×
• Brewer v. Porch
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-01-20· cited 204×
• In Re Application of Fontana
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-12-30· cited 16×
• In re P.A.F.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-05-08· cited 13×
• Nebesne v. Crocetti
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-06-14· cited 12×
• State v. Blazanin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-02-28· cited 3×