In Re Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accordingly, both parties agreed to the plan as confirmed and both parties will be forced to comply with its terms.”
• “The law is well settled that a confirmation order is res judicata as to all issues decided or which could have been decided at the hearing on confirmation.”
• “The law is well settled that a confirmation order is res judicata as to all issues decided or which could have been decided at the hearing on confirmation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• James W. Adair v. Michael L. Sherman and Sherman & Sherman
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 158×
• Lenior v. GE Capital Corp. (In Re Lenior)
  N.D. Illinois· 1999-03-11· cited 29×
• Strong v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Strong)
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-12-10· cited 26×
• Solow v. American Airlines, Inc. (In Re Midway Airlines, Inc.)
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-05-07· cited 23×
• Simmons v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Simmons)
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-09-25· cited 16×
• Fryer v. Easy Money Title Pawn, Inc. (In Re Fryer)
  S.D. Georgia· 1994-09-29· cited 15×
• In Re Hight
  S.D. Texas· 2008-08-13· cited 12×
• Bossert v. United States (In Re Bossert)
  E.D. Washington· 1996-10-16· cited 8×
• Stevens v. Baxter (In Re Stevens)
  S.D. Georgia· 1995-09-22· cited 8×
• In Re Adams
  N.D. Illinois· 2002-03-26· cited 5×
• In Re Kincaid
  E.D. California· 2004-10-08· cited 4×
• Adair, James W. v. Sherman & Sherman
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 1×