In Re Roselle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that debtor’s entire $2,453.30 monthly disability insurance benefit was not reasonably necessary based, in part, on finding that debtor’s housing expenses could be substantially reduced by his relocation to an apartment
• applying the Hamo factors to a claimed exemption in monthly disability insurance payments
• “When analyzing the facts and circumstances of each case, the [e]ourt is not restricted to these factors, nor is the court required to specifically address each factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).