In Re: Rose A. Tirch, Debtor. Rose A. Tirch v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a debtor’s decision not to enroll in ICRP is “not a per se indication of a lack of good faith”
• denying discharge of student loans when the only evidence presented at the trial court level was the debtor's testimony that she was unable to work, which was \unsupported by competent medical or psychological evidence\
• denying discharge of student loans when the only evidence presented at the trial court level was the debtor's testimony that she was unable to work, which was \unsupported by competent medical or psychological evidence\
• debtor did not illustrate good faith when she did not take advantage of the William D. Ford Income Contingent Repayment plan
• without discussing burden allocation, court concludes that debtor has failed to meet his burden of proof on issue of whether a loan used for bar review course was not a student loan
• debtor’s decision to not take advantage of the Income Contingent Repayment plan, “while not a per se indication of a lack of good faith ... is probative of her intent to repay her loans”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).