In Re Ronald D. Schoenwald and Charles F. Barfknecht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “proof of utility is not a prerequisite to availability of a prior art reference under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b
• “Paramount among the patentability requirements is that that which is sought to be patented must be new.”
• “it is beyond argument that no utility need be disclosed for a reference to be anticipatory of a claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).