In re Robinson v. Rehfus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen an anti-SLAPP motion to 9 strike challenges only the legal sufficiency of a claim, a district court should apply the Federal 10 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard and consider whether a claim is properly stated.”
• “[W]hen 21 an anti-SLAPP motion to strike challenges only the legal sufficiency of a claim, a district court 22 should apply the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard and consider whether a 23 claim is properly stated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).