In Re Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the debtor may not “ ‘abandon’ an interest which [had] already been taken from him by the state court”
• an amended plan may provide for treatment of a secured debt either by way of payment or surrender of the security

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Zak
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-01-12· cited 32×
• Maple Forest Condominium Ass'n v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-08-22· cited 13×
• In Re Stone
  S.D. Texas· 1993-12-14· cited 12×
• Green v. McKay
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2012-08-02· cited 12×
• In Re White
  N.D. Ohio· 2002-08-02· cited 11×
• In Re CORMIER
  D. Massachusetts· 2010-07-15· cited 10×
• In re Trujillo
  D. Colorado· 2012-09-27· cited 10×
• Manion v. Providian National Bank
  D. Colorado· 2001-11-06· cited 8×
• Stranko v. Behanna (In re Behanna)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-02-04· cited 6×
• Losak v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Losak)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-09-21· cited 5×
• In re Ware
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-07-17· cited 4×
• In Re Williams
  D. Colorado· 1987-02-23· cited 3×
• In re Sharak
  N.D. New York· 2017-05-18· cited 2×
• In Re Rehanna
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-02-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Noble v. Sturm
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1920-06-07· cited 11×
• Peoples Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dalton (In Re Dalton)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1982-12-20· cited 2×