In Re Robert's Tours & Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an application that sought an expansion of motor-carrier service did not constitute a property interest that implicated the due-process clause
• holding that an application that sought an expansion of motor-carrier service did not constitute a property interest that implicated the due-process clause
• holding that an “evidentiary hearing” on an application to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN
• holding that an \evidentiary hearing\ on an application to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN
• Holding that a phrase in HRS § 271-32(e) that limits standing to “a person aggrieved in the contested case hearing” is intended to apply only in the event that the PUC con - ducts a contested case hearing
• explaining that under HRS § 91-14(g) \we see no 53 FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER reason why the standards of review for an agency decision should differ depending on whether the appeal arises from a contested or noncontested case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).