In Re Roberts Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a case was moot, but only because the reorganization plans had been implemented to the point where it was impossible to fashion effective relief
• holding that where “the property transactions [on appeal] do not stand independently and apart from the plan of arrangement ... [reversal in the absence of a stay] would do nothing other than create an unmanageable, uncontrollable situation for the Bankruptcy Court”
• noting that our court could “order the disgorgement of attorney’s fees previously paid out of Focus’ estate to the [appellees’] attorneys”
• illustrating that a failure to seek a stay can render an appeal equitably 10 moot
• noting that appellant should file motion to stay judgment with Circuit 3The bankruptcy court further found that the Plan had been proposed in good faith, see 11 U.S.C. 1129(a)(3
• dismissing appeal of order authorizing corporate reorganization as moot, where in the event of reversal “it is impossible to fashion effective relief for all concerned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).