In Re Robert John Price, Debtor. Roy E. Lompa v. Robert John Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that adequate notice was provided where debtor’s counsel gave creditor’s counsel actual notice of the bankruptcy proceedings during state court litigation of the creditor’s claim, fifty-eight days before the claims bar date
• holding that a creditor who had received actual notice of a bankruptcy proceeding through his counsel did not suffer a due process violation because he had notice “in time to file a complaint, or at least to file a timely motion for an extension of time”
• regarding a complaint under § 523(c) and Rule 4007(d), where the creditor’s attorney received notice of the filing but the creditor did not
• late complaint against discharge barred when creditors’ counsel had actual knowledge of debtor’s chapter 7 bankruptcy filing two months before bar date
• “The fact that Price failed to list Lompa as a creditor did not relieve Lompa of his obligation to take timely action to protect his claim.”
• counsel received notice two months before the bar date via a notice concerning the automatic stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).