In Re: Robert J. Gaudet, Jr. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the basis for the conversion ratio and concluding district court’s reliance on it was not plain error
• “[Sjimilar substantive crimes committed on different dates involving different victims are not considered related even if each [were] committed with the same purpose or common goal, usually that of acquiring money.”
• “The general principle ‘that courts of appeals do not consider claims or arguments that were not raised before the district court,’ however, ‘is a prudential rule, not a jurisdictional one.’” (quoting United States v. Hayes, 218 F.3d 564, 567-78 (6th Cir. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).