Skip to main content
· 1/15/1929

In re Robert A. Wright & Co.

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 820
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Abercrombie resolved the historical uncertainty as to whether the type of evidence described in ORS 42.220 should be admitted to aid the court in determining if an ambiguity exists
  • explaining that extrinsic evidence may only affect interpretation when there is language in the instrument that is susceptible to being construed to carry out the proposed intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McVicar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.