In re R.M. and R.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutory provisions similar to section 901.211 \do not address those strip searches that are conducted incident to a lawful arrest on a felony charge\
• holding that reach-in search was reasonable where police searched suspect on side of a restaurant, out of public view, by pulling pants and underwear away from suspect’s body to retrieve drugs
• holding that reach-in search was reasonable where police searched suspect on side of a restaurant, out of public view, by pulling pants and underwear away from suspect's body to retrieve drugs
• holding that reach-in -5- search was reasonable where police searched suspect on side of a restaurant, out of public view, by pulling pants and underwear away from suspect’s body to retrieve drugs
• adopting the requirement that an officer have reasonable suspicion “that the individual is carrying a weapon or contraband” prior to conducting a strip search
• stating that a “reach-in” search is a type of “strip search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).