Skip to main content

In re R.M.

Syllabus

The respondent appealed from a Family Court decree, issued on November 24, 2021, terminating his parental rights to his biological child. The respondent maintained that the decree should be vacated because the trial justice erred in finding that he was unfit to parent, that the Department of Children, Youth, and Families made reasonable efforts to achieve reunification, and that it was in the child's best interests to terminate his parental rights. <br><br>The Supreme Court determined that competent evidence supported the trial justice's findings. Accordingly, the Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Family Court.<br><br>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.